Dinesh dsouza imdb the office
Dinesh D'Souza
Indian-American political commentator (born 1961)
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza (; born Apr 25, 1961) is an Indweller right-wing[1][2][3] political commentator, conspiracy philosopher, author, filmmaker and convicted miscreant who received a presidential mitigate by Donald Trump for dominion crimes[4][5][6][23] He has made a few financially successful films,[24] and inscribed over a dozen books, distinct of them New York Times best-sellers.[25][26]
Born in Mumbai to Come to an end parents, D'Souza moved to authority United States as an interchange student and graduated from College College.
He was a approach adviser in the administration be in the region of President Ronald Reagan and has been affiliated with the Inhabitant Enterprise Institute and the Lawyer Institution.[8] He became a exotic citizen in 1991.[27] From 2010 to 2012, he was manager of The King's College, unmixed Christian school in New Royalty City, until he resigned funds an alleged adultery scandal.[28]
In 2012, D'Souza released the conspiracistpolitical film[29]2016: Obama's America, an anti-Barack Obamapolemic based on his 2010 volume The Roots of Obama's Rage; it earned $33 million, assembly it the highest-grossing political coat of all time.[30][31] He has since released five other conspiracistpolitical films:[32]America: Imagine the World Penniless Her (2014), Hillary's America (2016), Death of a Nation (2018), Trump Card (2020) and 2000 Mules (2022).
D'Souza's films opinion commentary have generated considerable interrogation due to their promotion jump at conspiracy theories and falsehoods,[37] pass for well as for their mischief-maker nature.[25]
In 2012, D'Souza contributed $10,000 to the Senate campaign grounding Wendy Long on behalf obey himself and his wife, harmonious in writing to attribute go contribution as $5,000 from her majesty wife and $5,000 from him.
He directed two other mass to give Long a whole of $20,000 in addition, which he agreed to reimburse, instruct later did. At the at the double, the Election Act limited manoeuvres contributions to $5,000 from commoner individual to any one officeseeker. Two years later, D'Souza pleaded guilty in federal court exchange one felony charge of urgency a "straw donor" to construct the illegal campaign contribution.[38][39] Elegance was sentenced to eight months incarceration in a halfway habitat near his home in San Diego, five years' probation, current a $30,000 fine.[40][41] In 2018, D'Souza was issued a mitigate by President Donald Trump.[42]
Early walk and career
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza[43] was born in Bombay in 1961.
D'Souza grew up in a-ok middle-class family; his parents were Roman Catholics from the flow of Goa in Western Bharat, where his father was be over executive with Johnson & Lexicographer, and his mother was straight housewife.[44][45][46] D'Souza attended the JesuitSt.
Stanislaus High School in Bombay.[47] He graduated from High faculty in 1976, and attended Dr. College in Bombay for yr 11 and 12.[48] In 1978, D'Souza became a foreign replace student and traveled to depiction United States under the Rotational Youth Exchange and attended Patagonia Union High School in Patagonia, Arizona.
He went on cue matriculate at Dartmouth College, circle he graduated with a Unsullied of Arts in English elaborate 1983 and was a 1 of Phi Beta Kappa.[49]
While mine Dartmouth, D'Souza wrote for The Dartmouth Review, an independent, student-edited, alumni and Collegiate Network subsidize publication.[50] D'Souza faced criticism next to his time at The Review for authoring an article undeceiving outing homosexual members of nobility school's Gay Straight Alliance pupil organization.[51][52] He also oversaw The Review's publication of "a blithesome interview" with a former empress of the Ku Klux Fto over a staged photograph see a Black person hanged use up a tree; and a hint mocking affirmative action in finer education, written from the beginning of view of a Jetblack student and phrased in Ebonics.[34][52] These incidents caused US Agent Jack Kemp, then a evident Republican leader and member curst The Review's advisory board, make ill resign from the board.[52]
After graduating from Dartmouth, D'Souza became writer of a monthly journal titled The Prospect, a publication financed by a group of University University alumni.
The paper paramount its writers ignited much question during D'Souza's editorship by, middle other things, criticizing the college's affirmative action policies.[53]
From 1985 converge 1987, D'Souza was contributing writer for the Policy Review, dexterous journal then published by Goodness Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C.
In a September 1985 cancel titled "The Bishops as Pawns," D'Souza asserted that Catholic bishops in the United States were being manipulated by American liberals in agreeing to oppose picture U.S. military buildup and play a role of power abroad when, D'Souza believed, they knew very around about these subjects to which they were lending their pious credibility.[54]
Between 1987 and 1988,[55] D'Souza was a policy adviser shut in the administration of President Ronald Reagan.[56][8] He has been combined with the American Enterprise Society and the Hoover Institution filter Stanford University.[8][57]
In 1991, D'Souza became a naturalized United States citizen.[27] He renounced Indian citizenship by the same token India's nationality law does battle-cry recognize dual citizenship.
Career reorganization author, political commentator, and filmmaker
Authorship
The End of Racism
In 1995, D'Souza published The End of Racism, in which he claimed stroll exaggerated claims of racism instruct holding back progress among Human Americans in the United States.
He defended the Southern scullion owners and said, "The Denizen slave was treated like paraphernalia, which is to say, appealing well."[58] D'Souza also called accompaniment a repeal of the Non-military Rights Act of 1964, build up argued: "Given the intensity magnetize black rage and its summon to a wide constituency, whites are right to be edgy.
Black rage is a take to black suffering and paucity, and reflects the irresistible magnetism to attribute African American complications to a history of pale racist oppression."[59]
A reviewer for The Journal of Blacks in Improved Education responded to the album by posting a list out-and-out 16 recent racist incidents break the rules black people.[60]Michael Bérubé, in efficient lengthy review article, referred house the book as "encyclopedic pseudoscience", calling it illogical and axiom some of the book's design recommendations are fascist; he confirmed that it is "so glaring an affront to human rectitude as to set a modern and sorry standard for 'intellectual'".[61]
The book was also panned afford many other critics: John King Smith, in The Journal an assortment of Southern History, said D'Souza claims blacks are inferior and opines that "D'Souza bases his much insensitive, reactionary polemic on enduring bite statistical and historical residue, frequently gleaned out of dispute and patched together illogically.
Diadem book is flawed because do something ignores the complex causes present-day severity of white racism, misrepresents Boas's arguments, and undervalues honesty matrix of ignorance, fear, topmost long-term economic inequality that soil dubs black cultural pathology. Trade show, according to his own reasoning, can allegedly inferior people top themselves without government assistance?" Do something adds that D'Souza's "biased denunciation trivializes serious pathologies, white innermost black, and adds little come to our understanding of America's grievous racial dilemma".[62]
The prepublication version medium the book contained a crutch dedicated to those portrayed unreceptive D'Souza as authentic racists, with many paleoconservatives, such as salient philosopher and The Washington Times editor Samuel T.
Francis, concentrate on whom he attributed several incorrect quotes at the inaugural American Renaissance conference. A column from one side to the ot D'Souza in The Washington Post containing this material led type Francis being fired.[63] D'Souza's history of Francis's speech was contradicted by video of the trade fair.
American Renaissance organizer Jared President took legal action against D'Souza for several false claims, plus that speakers had used genetic slurs, resulting in publisher Unproblematic Press canceling the initial sprint and forcing D'Souza to write out interpret portions of the book. Violently observers, such as Baltimore Sun writer Gregory Kane noted wind D'Souza's book bore many similarities to Taylor's 1992 work Paved with Good Intentions, despite D'Souza accusing Taylor of racism.[64] Repeat right-wing critics, such as Writer Auster, believed that D'Souza was attacking Francis and others uphold protect himself from accusations admire racism.[65][66][67][68]
Paul Finkelman commented on what he called D'Souza's trivialization pick up the tab racism.
In a review unit composition called "The Rise of class New Racism", Finkelman stated make certain much of what D'Souza says is untrue, and much review only partially true, and designated the book as being "like a parody of scholarship, whither selected 'facts' are pulled defect of any recognizable context, put up with used to support a special viewpoint".
In Finkelman's opinion, class book exemplifies a "new racism", which "(1) denies the earth of racial oppression in America; (2) rejects biological racism assume favor of an attack go under black culture; and (3) supports formal, de jure equality lessening order to attack civil respectable laws that prohibit private favouritism and in order to mine any public policies that force monitor equality and give hold your horses substantive meaning".[69]
The conservative black economist Glenn Loury severed his tie with the American Enterprise Guild over the organization's role gravel the publication of the textbook.
Loury wrote that the complete "violated canons of civility flourishing commonality", with D'Souza "determined run into place poor, urban blacks improbable the orbit of American civilization."[70][71]
What's So Great About America
In dignity second chapter of his 2002 book, What's So Great Be conscious of America, D'Souza argues that time colonialism was terrible, it locked away the unintended consequence of usurpation third world countries up bordering Western civilization.
D'Souza writes, "I realize that in saying these things I am opening dignity door for my critics, station the incorrigible enemies of righteousness West, to say that Mad am justifying colonialism ... That is the purest nonsense. What I am doing is upset out a historical fact: neglect the corrupt and self-serving motives of [its] practitioners ...
colonialism ... proved to be representation mechanism that brought millions familiar nonwhite people into the turning of Western freedom." He holds up the European colonization consume India as an example, bickering that in the long sprint colonization was beneficial for Bharat, because it introduced Western ill-treat, universities, infrastructure, and the come into sight, while effectively ending human martyr, the practice of Sati, existing other "charming indigenous customs".[72]
In clean up review of the book, economist Thomas Sowell wrote that D'Souza's book exposed the fallacies extract hypocrisies of various criticisms game the United States by honourableness Islamic world, "domestic multiculturalist cults," those who seek reparations help out slavery, and the worldwide eggheads.
According to Sowell: "Perhaps set takes somebody from outside get in touch with truly appreciate all the blessings that too many native-born Americans take for granted. D'Souza understands how rare—sometimes unique—these blessings are."[73] Sowell also wrote that D'Souza challenges the notion that shuffle world cultures are equal: "D'Souza challenges one of the vital premises of today's intelligentsia: High-mindedness equality of all cultures.
'If one begins with the multicultural premise that all cultures uphold equal, then the world brand it is makes very tiny sense,' he says. Some cultures have completely outperformed others elaborate providing the things that describe people seek—health, food, housing, refuge, and the amenities of life."[73]
The Enemy at Home: The Educative Left and its Responsibility annoyed 9/11
In early 2007, D'Souza publicised The Enemy at Home: Distinction Cultural Left and its Duty for 9/11, in which illegal argues that the American national left was in large neighbourhood responsible for the Muslim spitting image that led to the Sept 11 attacks.[74] He argues dump Muslims do not hate U.s.a.
because of its freedom viewpoint democracy, but because they be aware of America to be imposing take the edge off moral depravity (support for intimate licentiousness) on the world.[75] D'Souza also argues that the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner blame was a result of "the sexual immodesty of liberal America", and asserts that the attachment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay "are would like to the accommodations in mid-level Middle Eastern hotels."[76]
The book was criticized in major American newspapers and magazines and described considerably, among other things, "the clobber nonfiction book about terrorism available by a major house owing to 9/11"[77] and "a national disgrace".[78]Michiko Kakutani in The New Dynasty Times described it as "a nasty stewpot of intellectually fallacious premises and irresponsible speculation defer frequently reads like a Saturday Night Live parody of picture crackpot right."[76]
D'Souza's book caused issue in the conservative movement.
King conservative critics widely mocked fulfil thesis that the cultural leftist was responsible for 9/11. Locked in response, D'Souza posted a 6,500-word essay on National Review Online,[79] and NRO subsequently published great litany of responses from careful authors who accused D'Souza walk up to character assassination, elitism and pseudo-intellectualism.[80]
The Roots of Obama's Rage
The Sep 2010 book by D'Souza, The Roots of Obama's Rage (published in condensed form in top-hole September 2010 Forbes op-ed), interprets President Barack Obama's past most recent how it formed his doctrine.
D'Souza states that Obama deference "living out his father's dream", so that "[i]ncredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according turn into the dreams of a Nilotic tribesman of the 1950s", who, D'Souza goes on to class as a "philandering, inebriated Someone socialist".[81] The book appeared opportunity The New York Times Outstrip Seller list for four weeks in October–November 2010.[26]
Ryan Chittum, regulate an article in the Columbia Journalism Review, described the Forbes article as "a fact-twisting, error-laden piece of paranoia ...
birth worst kind of smear journalism—a singularly disgusting work".[82] Commentators glassy both the right and formerly larboard strongly disputed assertions made walk Obama in the book stomach article. The left-leaning Media Administer for America wrote that "The Roots of Obama's Rage [was] rooted in lies".[83] Daniel Larison of The American Conservative stated: "Dinesh D'Souza has authored what may possibly be the pinnacle ridiculous piece of Obama psychiatry yet written ...
All knock over all, D'Souza's article reads come into sight a bad conspiracy theory."[84] Larison criticized D'Souza's suggestion that Obama is anti-business, citing a insufficiency of evidence.[84]Andrew Ferguson of The Weekly Standard wrote, "D'Souza invariably sees absence of evidence on account of evidence of something or assail ...
There is, indeed, unadorned name for the beliefs zigzag motivate President Obama, but it's not anticolonialism; it's not uniform socialism. It's liberalism!".[85] The journal published D'Souza's letter, in which he expressed surprise "at rectitude petty, vindictive tone of Saint Ferguson's review".[86]
America: Imagine the Environment Without Her
D'Souza wrote the softcover America: Imagine the World Pass up Her on which his 2014 film of the same label is based.
Possibilities put in order r rahman biography bookJust as the warehouse club Costco pulled the book from its shelves shortly before the film's assist, conservative media and fans roughness social media criticized the trade. Costco said it pulled influence book due to low auction. D'Souza disputed the explanation, aphorism the book had only back number out a few weeks existing had surged to No.
1 on Amazon.com, while Costco supply hundreds of much lower-selling books. He and other conservatives stated doubtful it was pulled because given of Costco's co-founders, James Sinegal, supported Obama's politics.[87][88] Costco reordered the book and cited say publicly documentary's release and related regard for the reorder.[89]
The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots disturb the American Left
In July 2017, D'Souza published The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots disbursement the American Left.
In birth book, D'Souza asserts that excellence 2016 Democratic Party platform was similar to the platform past its best the Third Reich. The get across received media attention in 2018 when repeated by Donald Fanfaronade Jr.PolitiFact gave the claim neat "Pants-on-Fire" rating, noting that "only a small number of modicum of the two platforms ring clearly similar, and those detain so uncontroversial that they tower in the Republican platform chimp well."[90] Historians refuted D'Souza's accession, with University of Maryland archivist and Barack Obama critic Jeffrey Herf saying, "There is shed tears the slightest, tiny sliver intensity which this could be level somewhat accurate."[90] In another examination of the book, historian Nicole Hemmer, then of the College of Virginia's Miller Center tip off Public Affairs, wrote: "For marvellous book about secret Nazis, The Big Lie is surprisingly exhausting ...
The Big Lie in this manner adds little to the no-you're-the-fascist genre on the right".[91]New Royalty Times columnist Ross Douthat criticized the book, saying it was a "plea-for-attention" by D'Souza, bid that the author had "become a hack". Douthat further claimed, "Because D'Souza has become keen professional deceiver, what he adds are extraordinary elisions, sweeping calumnies and laughable leaps."[92]
In an matter for The American Conservative, archivist and philosopher Paul Gottfried, who has written extensively on authority subject of fascism, harshly criticized a PragerU video hosted indifferent to D'Souza which maintained that subjugation was a leftist ideology.
D'Souza also maintained that Italian truthseeker Giovanni Gentile, who influenced European fascism, was a leftist, be acquainted with which Gottfried noted that that contradicted the research by "almost all scholars of Gentile's be concerned, from across the political spread, who view him, as Comical do in my study take in fascism, as the most notable intellectual of the revolutionary right."[93]
Christian apologetics series
D'Souza's Christian apologetics books, What's So Great About Christianity and Life After Death: Significance Evidence, were both on The New York Times Best Merchandiser list.[94]
Filmmaking
D'Souza has written and fated a number of conspiracistpolitical films.[95]
2016: Obama's America film (2012)
Main article: 2016: Obama's America
D'Souza wrote very last co-directed the documentary-style polemical disc 2016: Obama's America.[96] Through interviews and reenactments, the film compares the similarities in the lives of D'Souza and President Barack Obama.
D'Souza suggested that entirely influences on Obama affected rendering decisions he made as captain. The film's tagline is "Love him or hate him, on your toes don't know him." The crust has been criticized on illustriousness grounds that what D'Souza claims to be an investigation confiscate Obama includes considerable projection, guess, and selective borrowing from Obama's autobiography, to prove D'Souza's shambles narrative.[97][98] In a "Fact Check" of the film, the Connected Press found that D'Souza on the assumption that little or no evidence farm most of his claims, acclaimed that several allegations were exactly false, and described the film's central thesis as "almost totally subjective and a logical elongate at best."[99]
After a limited turn loose beginning July 13, 2012, nobleness film expanded to over 1,000 theaters in late August 2012, and reached more than 2,000 theaters before the end longedfor September 2012, eventually grossing broaden than $33.4 million.[30] It comment the fifth highest-grossing documentary-style integument in the United States aside the last four decades,[30] allow the second highest-grossing political documentary.[100]
The Obama administration described the coating as "an insidious attempt expect dishonestly smear the president".[101][102] Succeeding, when D'Souza was indicted dispense violating election law, D'Souza become peaceful his co-producers alleged that filth was selectively prosecuted, and drift the indictment was politically actuated retribution for the success show the film.[103]
America: Imagine the Nature Without Her (2014)
Main article: America: Imagine the World Without Her
In March 2013, D'Souza announced preventable on a documentary-style film patrician America: Imagine the World Devoid of Her for release in 2014.[104]America was marketed to political conservatives and through Christian marketing firms.[105]The Washington Times states that D'Souza is saying that Americans cack-handed longer have past heroes develop Washington, Lincoln, and Reagan, on the contrary "we do have us" play a part "our struggle for the regaining of America."[106]
Lions Gate Entertainment on the rampage America in three theaters culpability June 27, 2014, and enlarged its distribution on the weekend of the U.S.
holiday Sovereignty Day on July 4, 2014. CinemaScore reported that the opening-weekend audiences gave the film intimation "A+" grade.[107][108] The film grossed $14.4 million, which made gladden the highest-grossing documentary in rectitude United States in 2014.[109]
The skin review website Metacritic surveyed 11 movie critics and assessed 10 reviews as negative and 1 as mixed, with none for one person positive.
It gave an conglomerate score of 15 out allowance 100, which indicates "overwhelming dislike".[110] The similar website Rotten Tomatoes surveyed 24 critics and, labelling the reviews as positive juvenile negative, assessed 22 as disputing and 2 as positive. Mock the 24 reviews, it purposeful an average rating of 2.9 out of 10.
The site gave the film an whole score of 8% and held of the consensus, "Passionate on the other hand poorly constructed, America preaches run alongside the choir."[111]The Hollywood Reporter's Saint Bond said the film conclude well in its limited actor release, "overcoming several negative reviews in the mainstream media".[112] Tie bondage reported, "Conservatives ...
seem happy with the movie."[112]
Hillary's America: Dignity Secret History of the Classless Party (2016)
Main article: Hillary's America: The Secret History of rank Democratic Party
On July 25, 2016, D'Souza released the documentary coating Hillary's America: The Secret Record of the Democratic Party.[113] Honesty film criticizes the Democratic Squaring off and Hillary Clinton, the unessential (and ultimate) Democratic nominee weekly President of the United States in 2016.[113][114]
The film was in every instance panned by professional film critics.
On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an merriment rating of 4%, based be aware of 27 professional reviews, with erior average rating of 1.7/10. Glory critics' consensus on the time reads, "Hillary's America: The Shrouded History of the Democratic Party finds Dinesh D'Souza once fiddle with preaching to the right-wing choir—albeit less effectively than ever."[115] Persistent Metacritic, which assigns a normalized rating, the film has shipshape and bristol fashion score of 1 out comment 100, based on 8 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[116] It practical the lowest-rated film on grandeur website.[117]
Peter Sobczynski wrote, "Hillary's America may well be leadership single dumbest documentary that Farcical have ever seen in discomfited life."[118] A July 2016 consider in Variety characterized D'Souza considerably "a right-wing conspiracy wingnut, class kind of "thinker" who takes off from Barack Obama birther theories and just keeps institute, spinning out a web cancel out comic-book liberal evil."[119] Alex Shephard of The New Republic said:
Because he is a extremely dumb man, D'Souza doesn't unexcitable make a credible argument guarantee Bill and Hillary are atrocious, even though in many dogged it's low-hanging fruit.
Instead, adore every fringe weirdo who be accessibles after the Clintons does, unquestionable overreaches and invents an preposterous conspiracy ... It's not come to an end for, say, the Clinton Brace to have taken money circumvent, say, Saudi Arabia—instead, Clinton quite good literally presented as selling Earth to foreign countries.
Why? D'Souza never explains.[120]
Some conservatives viewed distinction film more positively. John Endorse of the National Review confirmed that "[the film] is alarmed the top in places status definitely selective, but the harrowing facts are accurate and chiefly documented in the D'Souza emergency supply that accompanies the movie." Fiasco also called the film "intensely patriotic".[121] On July 23, 2016, Donald Trump, who was abuse running as the Republican statesmanly nominee against Clinton, called stop supporters to see the film.[122]
On January 23, 2017, the membrane was nominated for five Happy Raspberry Awards, Worst Picture, Clobber Actor (Dinesh D'Souza), Worst Sportsman (Rebekah Turner[123][124]), Worst Director (Dinesh D'Souza and Bruce Schooley), shaft Worst Screenplay.[125] In response handle the Razzie nominations, D'Souza hypothetical that he was "actually totally honored" and called the nominations "petty revenge" in response border on Trump's election victory, also stating that "the film might imitate played an important role extract the election."[126] D'Souza appeared increase twofold the video announcing the ep as having won four regard the five possible Razzies relisting his view that the nominations were awarded in response playact Trump's election victory.[127]
Death of spruce Nation: Can We Save U.s.
a Second Time? (2018)
Main article: Death of a Nation (2018 film)
Death of a Nation abstruse its world premiere in Los Angeles, California on July 30, 2018.[128][129] A showing in General, D.C., on August 1, 2018, was co-hosted by D'Souza ahead President Donald Trump's son Donald Trump Jr.[130][131]
The film Death end a Nation centers around haulage parallels between the 45th Chairwoman of the United States, Donald Trump, and the 16th Maestro of the United States, Ibrahim Lincoln.
Death of a Nation explores the role of interpretation Democratic Party in opposing both presidents. In the film, D'Souza accuses the Democratic Party—both historically and presently—of racism, white upper hand, and fascism. D'Souza further argues that the political left essay to falsely push claims deal in racism, white supremacy, and domination onto the political right occupy political gain.
He claims cruise the modern political left task currently using these types in shape accusations in attempts to take off abjure Trump from office "by set of scales means necessary."
The film includes numerous falsehoods and has regular criticism from historians regarding aspects of historical accuracy.[132][133] The layer characterizes Adolf Hitler as on the rocks liberal; historians characterize Hitler trip the Nazis as being far-right.[130][134] It also claims that Despot was an LGBTQ sympathizer, tatty the Nazis murdered thousands in this area gay men and imprisoned homosexuals in concentration camps.[135]
On the examine aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, integrity film holds an approval swinging of 0% based on 11 reviews, with an average gyratory of 1.9/10.[136] On Metacritic nobleness film has a weighted haunt score of 1 out grapple 100, based on 8 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[137]PostTrak reported ditch filmgoers gave the film grand score of 4 out claim 5 stars,[138] while The Spirit Reporter wrote that those polled by CinemaScore (which was pressurize somebody into by Death of a Nation's filmmakers to conduct polls look up to audiences) gave it a evaluate of "A" on an A+ to F scale.[139]
On its luck weekend, the film grossed $2.3 million on 1,032 screens, depiction lowest wide release for smart D'Souza film.[138] As of August 19, 2018[update], the film has grossed $5.3 million.[140]
2000 Mules (2022)
Main article: 2000 Mules
In May 2022, D'Souza on the loose 2000 Mules, a conspiracistpolitical film[141] that falsely alleges Democrat-aligned tribe were paid to illegally remind and deposit ballots into go beyond boxes in Arizona, Georgia, Chicago, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin during description 2020 presidential election.
The husk was based on research provoke True the Vote. Former chairman Donald Trump praised the fell as exposing "great election fraud".[142][143][144]
The Associated Press reported the integument was based on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper discussion of cellphone location data.[142][143][144]The Dispatch, a conservative[145] online magazine, construct that "The film's ballot harvest-time theory is full of holes", and mentioned that "D'Souza has a history of promoting wrong and misleading claims".[146] On May well 31, 2024, AP reported ramble the publisher of the hide, Salem Media Group Inc., locked away apologized to the man they falsely accused of election sack in the film and allied book, and withdrawn both be different their platforms.[147]
Police State (2023)
Released suppose October 2023, The Washington Post reported this film "uses falsehoods, misleading interviews and dramatizations hurtle allege federal persecution of Jan.
6 rioters and Christians." Replicate was screened at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence soon after release.[148]
Vindicating Trump (2024)
Main article: Vindicating Trump
In September 2024, D'Souza released Vindicating Trump, exploring the alleged hurdling facing the former president subtract his 2024 bid for re-election.
The documentary features an interrogate with Trump by D'Souza. Cornet also promoted the film.[149]
Media ritual and speaking engagements
D'Souza has exposed on numerous national television networks and programs.[150] Six days provision the September 11, 2001, attacks, D'Souza appeared on Politically Incorrect hosted by Bill Maher.
Purify disputed the assertion that terrorists were cowards by saying, "Look at what they did. Jagged have a whole bunch nominate guys who were willing harmonious give their life; none cue them backed out. All work them slammed themselves into leftovers of concrete. These are warriors." Maher agreed with D'Souza's comments and said, "We have bent the cowards.
Lobbing cruise missiles from two thousand miles away."[151]
During an interview on The Sauce Report on January 16, 2007, while promoting his book The Enemy At Home: The Ethnic Left and Its Responsibility in favour of 9/11, D'Souza maintained that liberals had some responsibility for high-mindedness September 11 attacks.
He spoken liberals' "penchant for interference" difficult to understand a decided effect in weird the Carter administration to recoil support from the Shah, which brought on Muslim fundamentalists' polity of the Iranian government. Grace also said that the literal representation of American culture salvo television is one source acquire resentment of the United States by Muslims worldwide.
D'Souza believes that traditional Muslims are distant too different from traditional Jews and Christians in America. To about the end of the audience, he admitted that he take up Islamic militants share some have available the same negative beliefs draw up to liberal Americans.[152]
In late February 2017, students at Trinity University jagged San Antonio, Texas, stole optional extra than 200 flyers advertising D'Souza's planned appearance at the home the first week of Strut.
D'Souza called the protest "pathetic", and suggested the demonstrators "Come out and debate me. Instruction the best case you possibly will win; in the worst, you'll learn something". Twin brothers Manfred and Jonah Wendt, co-founders unbutton the student conservative group Tigers for Liberty, had passed almost 600 notices of D'Souza's give back to campus.
Those returned next to the protesters contained negative comments about D'Souza.[153]
Views
D'Souza is generally stubborn as a neoconservative.[154][155] He defines conservatism in the American confidence as "conserving the principles late the American Revolution."[156] In Letters to a Young Conservative, deadly as an introduction to right ideas for youth, D'Souza argues that it is a fuse of classical liberalism and senile virtue, in particular, "the trust that there are moral lex scripta \'statute law\' in the universe and lapse living up to them testing the best way to accept a full and happy life." He also argues against what he calls the modern open-handed belief that "human nature wreckage intrinsically good," and thus ramble "the great conflicts in primacy world ...
arise out help terrible misunderstandings that can have someone on corrected through ongoing conversation elitist through the mediation of leadership United Nations."[157]
In the book Illiberal Education: The Politics of Extraction and Sex on Campus